One of the more profound discoveries I’ve made regarding color blindness is that there are only two hues in a color blind person’s world: blue and yellow. For some reason I thought that the hues between blue and green were still vivid colors, like this:

But actually it looks like this (deuteranope simulation):

You can see here that turquoise looks the same as gray/white — in other words, it looks colorless. There are really only two hues: anything between them looks less intense, more gray.
White light is a mixture of all colors – it activates all receptors equally. Because turquoise is right between the two receptors it also activates them equally. The two types of light are providing the same information, it takes a third receptor with a different response to tell the difference. Having a third receptor has a profound effect: all wavelengths become distinct colors, a rainbow of hues is visible. Would adding a fourth receptor have a similarly profound effect? I don’t think so — the spectrum is a linear one-dimensional type of information — but maybe I’m lacking imagination here.
Green traffic lights actually have a bluish tinge to them to distinguish them from the red and yellow lights. Because of this, they actually look white! Here is a digitally merged photo I took, along with a deuteranope simulation:
|
|
This colorless white/gray effect for hues that hit both receptors evenly is also visible on the other side of the color wheel, in the “unnatural” hues formed by mixing red and blue.
|
|
Thus the colors potentially confused by red-green color blind fellows goes beyond distinguishing between hues in the red-to-green range. Turquoise and magenta can be confused for gray, and purple can look blue. I’ll close here with a series of potential color confusions:
|
|